CLX-RAJ-HC-2019-000062
Hansraj - Appellant Versus Amit Kumar Saxena - Respondent
Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 12 April 2019
AllowedCore ratio / Key holding
In cases of permanent physical disability, compensation for loss of future prospects is to be calculated by adding 40% of the amount determined for permanent disability.
For amputation of a lower limb, a consolidated amount can be awarded towards pain and suffering, loss of amenities of life, and the cost of an artificial limb.
Headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - S.166 - Compensation - Permanent Disability - Future Prospects - Calculation
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - S.166 - Compensation - Amputation - Artificial Limb - Pain and Suffering - Loss of Amenities
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - S.166 - Compensation - Enhancement
Ratio decidendi
- In cases of permanent physical disability, compensation for loss of future prospects is to be calculated by adding 40% of the amount determined for permanent disability.
- For amputation of a lower limb, a consolidated amount can be awarded towards pain and suffering, loss of amenities of life, and the cost of an artificial limb.
Important points
- Held, compensation for permanent disability and future prospects enhanced from Rs. 8,14,000/- to Rs. 9,65,120/-.
- Directed, enhanced compensation amount to be invested in Fixed Deposit Receipts for three years, with monthly interest payment to the appellant.
- Clarified, Tribunal rightly applied multiplier of 15 based on appellant's age of 38 years at the time of accident.
- Affirmed, Tribunal rightly assessed income as Rs. 3,000/- per month for a skilled worker, rejecting unproven Exhibit-101.
- Confirmed, 40% permanent physical disability due to left leg amputation, as per Medical Board certificate, is accepted.
Keywords
Motor Vehicles ActCompensationPermanent DisabilityMultiplierFuture Prospects
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000020The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Manju W/o Dinesh Kumar Meena - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000019Shahida and Others - Appellants Versus Mubrak Shah and Others - Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000015Rekha Kanwar W/o Late Shri Satveer Singh - Appellant Versus United India Insurance Company Limited - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000016United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Nine 2 Nine Super Market - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000027Buddharam S/o Shri Moolchand Saini - Appellant Versus Sher Singh Meena S/o Shri Khyaliram Meena ANDO RS – Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000014Jakir Hussain Son of Shri Mohammad Hussain - Appellant Versus Shantilal Sansi Son of Shri Jagrup - Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.