CLX-RAJ-HC-2009-000110
Mazid Vs. Smt. Raj Kunwar & Ors.
Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 28 April 2009
AllowedCore ratio / Key holding
Where a deceased person in a goods vehicle was found to have hired the vehicle for carrying goods on hire and a premium for non-fare passengers was paid to the insurance company, the insurance company is fully liable to pay the entire compensation, and the deceased cannot be considered a gratuitous passenger or a pillion rider.
Headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – S.147 – Insurance Liability – Goods Vehicle – Gratuitous Passenger – Non-Fare Passenger Premium
Ratio decidendi
- Where a deceased person in a goods vehicle was found to have hired the vehicle for carrying goods on hire and a premium for non-fare passengers was paid to the insurance company, the insurance company is fully liable to pay the entire compensation, and the deceased cannot be considered a gratuitous passenger or a pillion rider.
Important points
- Held: Where deceased hired goods vehicle and non-fare passenger premium was paid, insurer is fully liable for compensation.
- Declared: The finding that deceased hired the truck for carrying goods and non-fare passenger premium was paid is binding and not perverse.
- Set Aside: Tribunal's direction holding owner liable for part compensation was set aside.
Keywords
Motor Vehicles ActInsurance LiabilityGratuitous PassengerGoods VehicleNon-Fare Passenger
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000020The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Manju W/o Dinesh Kumar Meena - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000019Shahida and Others - Appellants Versus Mubrak Shah and Others - Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000015Rekha Kanwar W/o Late Shri Satveer Singh - Appellant Versus United India Insurance Company Limited - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000016United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Nine 2 Nine Super Market - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000027Buddharam S/o Shri Moolchand Saini - Appellant Versus Sher Singh Meena S/o Shri Khyaliram Meena ANDO RS – Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000014Jakir Hussain Son of Shri Mohammad Hussain - Appellant Versus Shantilal Sansi Son of Shri Jagrup - Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.