CLX-RAJ-HC-2009-000110

Mazid Vs. Smt. Raj Kunwar & Ors.

Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 28 April 2009

Allowed

Core ratio / Key holding

Where a deceased person in a goods vehicle was found to have hired the vehicle for carrying goods on hire and a premium for non-fare passengers was paid to the insurance company, the insurance company is fully liable to pay the entire compensation, and the deceased cannot be considered a gratuitous passenger or a pillion rider.

Headnote

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – S.147 – Insurance Liability – Goods Vehicle – Gratuitous Passenger – Non-Fare Passenger Premium

Ratio decidendi

  • Where a deceased person in a goods vehicle was found to have hired the vehicle for carrying goods on hire and a premium for non-fare passengers was paid to the insurance company, the insurance company is fully liable to pay the entire compensation, and the deceased cannot be considered a gratuitous passenger or a pillion rider.

Important points

  • Held: Where deceased hired goods vehicle and non-fare passenger premium was paid, insurer is fully liable for compensation.
  • Declared: The finding that deceased hired the truck for carrying goods and non-fare passenger premium was paid is binding and not perverse.
  • Set Aside: Tribunal's direction holding owner liable for part compensation was set aside.

Keywords

Motor Vehicles ActInsurance LiabilityGratuitous PassengerGoods VehicleNon-Fare Passenger

Related orders from this authority

Read the full order on ClaimLex

Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.

Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.