CLX-IN-MOTOR-2023-000006
Government Of NCT Of Delhi & Ors. Versus Roppen Transportation Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Supreme Court of India · 12 June 2023
DisposedCore ratio / Key holding
Headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Aggregators — Two-wheelers — Interim Stay on Prohibition — Policy Formulation
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Aggregators — Licensing — Two-wheelers for Hire or Reward
Constitutional Law — Legislative Competence — Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Aggregator Licensing
Interim Relief — Statutory Provisions — Public Interest — Livelihood Concerns
Precedent — Aggregator Licensing — Section 93 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Precedent — Distinguishing Features — Two-wheeler Prohibition
Issues for determination
- Whether the interim orders passed by the Delhi High Court, permitting two-wheelers to ply for carrying passengers under an aggregator regime, ought to be sustained.
- Whether aggregators can operate two-wheelers for hire or reward without obtaining a license under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
- Whether the Delhi Government has the legislative competence to prescribe conditions for obtaining a license as an aggregator under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Ratio decidendi
- Interim orders staying a public notice that prohibits two-wheeler aggregators from operating without a statutory regime (policy/license) ought not to be passed, particularly when the government is actively formulating such a policy.
- The operation of two-wheeler aggregators for hire or reward without a proper license under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is impermissible, attracting penal provisions.
- The State Government possesses the legislative competence to prescribe conditions for obtaining a license as an aggregator, as stipulated in Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
- The potential suffering of a large number of two-wheeler owners due to a public notice prohibiting their operation as aggregators cannot, by itself, justify suspending the operation of prima facie statutory provisions.
- Previous Supreme Court judgments concerning aggregators (Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. and Roppen Transportation Services Pvt. Ltd.) did not establish that aggregators could operate without a license under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
- The specific public notice prohibiting two-wheelers for hire or reward in Delhi constitutes a distinguishing factual feature compared to previous cases concerning aggregators, where the subject dispute was not confined to two-wheelers.
Important points
- Held: Interim orders of the Delhi High Court permitting two-wheeler aggregators to operate were permanently stayed.
- Clarified: Operation of two-wheeler aggregators for hire or reward without a license under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is impermissible.
- Directed: Delhi Government to finalize its policy for two-wheeler aggregators by July 31, 2023.
- Directed: Applications for licenses/permits for two-wheelers under aggregators shall be dealt with expeditiously in a time-bound manner after policy formulation.
- Clarified: Supreme Court's observations in this order shall not bind the Delhi High Court in the final disposal of the writ petitions.
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-IN-MOTOR-2025-000009U.P. State Road Transport Corporation through its Chief General Manager – Appellant Versus Kashmiri Lal Batra and Others – Respondents
- CLX-IN-MOTOR-2025-000023Orion Conmerx Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
- CLX-IN-MOTOR-2025-000022K. Nagendra Versus The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
- CLX-IN-MOTOR-2025-000016Hind Samachar Ltd. (Delhi Unit) – Appellant Versus National Insurance Company Ltd. and Others – Respondents
- CLX-IN-MOTOR-2025-000024Amudhavalli & Ors. – Petitioners Versus HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors. – Respondents
- CLX-IN-MOTOR-2025-000008Shyam Lal – Appellant Versus Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others. – Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.