CLX-RAJ-HC-2018-000001
New India Assurance Company Limited - Appellant Versus Smt. Sushila - Respondent
Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 13 September 2018
DismissedCore ratio / Key holding
For a deceased aged 30 years in motor accident compensation cases, the applicable multiplier for calculating loss of dependency shall be 16, in accordance with the principles laid down in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi.
Where credible evidence, such as passports and flight tickets, establishes that a deceased was gainfully employed in a foreign country, that income shall be accepted for the purpose of computing compensation in motor accident claims.
In cases where the deceased was maintaining a wife, two children, and parents, the deduction for personal expenses from their income for calculating loss of dependency should not exceed 40%.
Headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — S.173 — Compensation — Multiplier — Deceased aged 30 years.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — S.173 — Compensation — Income Assessment — Foreign employment.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — S.173 — Compensation — Loss of Dependency — Personal expenses deduction.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — S.173 — Appeal — Dismissal.
Issues for determination
- Whether the computation of the wages of the deceased Devilal was fundamentally wrong?
Ratio decidendi
- For a deceased aged 30 years in motor accident compensation cases, the applicable multiplier for calculating loss of dependency shall be 16, in accordance with the principles laid down in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi.
- Where credible evidence, such as passports and flight tickets, establishes that a deceased was gainfully employed in a foreign country, that income shall be accepted for the purpose of computing compensation in motor accident claims.
- In cases where the deceased was maintaining a wife, two children, and parents, the deduction for personal expenses from their income for calculating loss of dependency should not exceed 40%.
Important points
- Held, for a deceased aged 30 years, the multiplier of 16 is applicable for compensation calculation in motor accident claims, as per National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi.
- Declared, income from foreign employment, if supported by credible evidence like passports and flight tickets, must be accepted for computing compensation.
- Clarified, for a deceased maintaining a wife, two children, and parents, the deduction for personal expenses should not exceed 40%.
- Appeal dismissed, as the recalculation of compensation using the correct multiplier and deduction percentage would yield a similar payable amount.
Keywords
Motor Vehicles ActCompensationMultiplierDependencyIncome Assessment
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000020The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Manju W/o Dinesh Kumar Meena - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000019Shahida and Others - Appellants Versus Mubrak Shah and Others - Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000015Rekha Kanwar W/o Late Shri Satveer Singh - Appellant Versus United India Insurance Company Limited - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000016United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Nine 2 Nine Super Market - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000027Buddharam S/o Shri Moolchand Saini - Appellant Versus Sher Singh Meena S/o Shri Khyaliram Meena ANDO RS – Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000014Jakir Hussain Son of Shri Mohammad Hussain - Appellant Versus Shantilal Sansi Son of Shri Jagrup - Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.