CLX-RAJ-HC-2008-000146

Vidhyadhar - Appellant Versus Banshilal & Anr. - Respondent

Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 5 August 2008

Allowed

Core ratio / Key holding

The Second Schedule attached to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, can be used as a guideline by the Court for assessing the loss suffered by a claimant in a case filed under Section 166 of the Act, and it has legal and persuasive value. If the Court deviates from the Second Schedule, it must state cogent and convincing reasons for doing so.

Headnote

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Sections 166, Second Schedule — Compensation — Permanent Disability — Assessment Guideline — Deviation Justification

Ratio decidendi

  • The Second Schedule attached to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, can be used as a guideline by the Court for assessing the loss suffered by a claimant in a case filed under Section 166 of the Act, and it has legal and persuasive value. If the Court deviates from the Second Schedule, it must state cogent and convincing reasons for doing so.

Important points

  • Award for permanent disability enhanced from Rs. 1,35,000/- to Rs. 3,03,552/- due to non-application of Second Schedule formula.
  • Insurance Company directed to pay enhanced remaining amount with 6% interest per annum from claim petition filing date (10.04.2003) till realization.
  • Lower Court directed to ensure delivery of remaining compensation to appellant within two months from judgment receipt.

Keywords

Motor Vehicles ActCompensationPermanent DisabilitySecond ScheduleMultiplier Method

Related orders from this authority

Read the full order on ClaimLex

Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.

Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.