CLX-RAJ-HC-2008-000146
Vidhyadhar - Appellant Versus Banshilal & Anr. - Respondent
Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 5 August 2008
AllowedCore ratio / Key holding
The Second Schedule attached to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, can be used as a guideline by the Court for assessing the loss suffered by a claimant in a case filed under Section 166 of the Act, and it has legal and persuasive value. If the Court deviates from the Second Schedule, it must state cogent and convincing reasons for doing so.
Headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Sections 166, Second Schedule — Compensation — Permanent Disability — Assessment Guideline — Deviation Justification
Ratio decidendi
- The Second Schedule attached to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, can be used as a guideline by the Court for assessing the loss suffered by a claimant in a case filed under Section 166 of the Act, and it has legal and persuasive value. If the Court deviates from the Second Schedule, it must state cogent and convincing reasons for doing so.
Important points
- Award for permanent disability enhanced from Rs. 1,35,000/- to Rs. 3,03,552/- due to non-application of Second Schedule formula.
- Insurance Company directed to pay enhanced remaining amount with 6% interest per annum from claim petition filing date (10.04.2003) till realization.
- Lower Court directed to ensure delivery of remaining compensation to appellant within two months from judgment receipt.
Keywords
Motor Vehicles ActCompensationPermanent DisabilitySecond ScheduleMultiplier Method
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000020The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Manju W/o Dinesh Kumar Meena - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000019Shahida and Others - Appellants Versus Mubrak Shah and Others - Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000015Rekha Kanwar W/o Late Shri Satveer Singh - Appellant Versus United India Insurance Company Limited - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000016United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Nine 2 Nine Super Market - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000027Buddharam S/o Shri Moolchand Saini - Appellant Versus Sher Singh Meena S/o Shri Khyaliram Meena ANDO RS – Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000014Jakir Hussain Son of Shri Mohammad Hussain - Appellant Versus Shantilal Sansi Son of Shri Jagrup - Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.