CLX-RAJ-HC-2008-000074
Aditya Sharma Vs. Bhawani Singh & Ors.
Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 16 September 2008
Partly AllowedCore ratio / Key holding
Compensation for loss of future earning/income in a motor accident case, where the injured sustained 28% disability and was earning Rs. 2900/- per month, is to be computed in view of the provisions of the Second Schedule to the Motor Vehicles Act by adopting a multiplier of 16 commensurate with the percentage of disability.
Headnote
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 — Second Schedule — Compensation — Loss of future earning/income — Disability.
Issues for determination
- Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for loss of future earning/income to the injured was adequate and deserved enhancement?
Ratio decidendi
- Compensation for loss of future earning/income in a motor accident case, where the injured sustained 28% disability and was earning Rs. 2900/- per month, is to be computed in view of the provisions of the Second Schedule to the Motor Vehicles Act by adopting a multiplier of 16 commensurate with the percentage of disability.
Important points
- Held that compensation for loss of future earning/income for 28% disability in a motor accident case, where the injured was earning Rs. 2900/- per month, is to be computed as per Second Schedule of M.V. Act using a multiplier of 16.
- Appeal partly allowed, enhancing total compensation by an additional amount of Rs. 1,34,004/- with 6% interest from 18.2.2005, to be paid within three months.
Keywords
Motor Vehicles ActCompensationDisabilityFuture EarningMultiplier
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000020The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Manju W/o Dinesh Kumar Meena - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000019Shahida and Others - Appellants Versus Mubrak Shah and Others - Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000015Rekha Kanwar W/o Late Shri Satveer Singh - Appellant Versus United India Insurance Company Limited - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000016United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Nine 2 Nine Super Market - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000027Buddharam S/o Shri Moolchand Saini - Appellant Versus Sher Singh Meena S/o Shri Khyaliram Meena ANDO RS – Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000014Jakir Hussain Son of Shri Mohammad Hussain - Appellant Versus Shantilal Sansi Son of Shri Jagrup - Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.