CLX-RAJ-HC-2004-000035
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. - Appellant Versus FATEH SINGH - Respondent
Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 8 November 2004
DismissedCore ratio / Key holding
Where an insurance agent issues a cover note explicitly stating risk coverage from a specific date, and the insurance company accepts a post-dated cheque for premium, the company is bound by the cover note's terms, and a subsequent policy issued with a later commencement date is a unilateral act not binding on the insured.
Section 64-VB of the Insurance Act, 1938, does not mandate actual receipt of premium by the insurance company for risk coverage, as it allows risk assumption from a date prior to actual receipt, such as the date a cheque is posted or money order booked.
Headnote
Motor Vehicle Insurance — Commencement of Risk — Cover Note vs. Policy Date
Insurance Act, 1938 — Section 64-VB — Premium Payment — Risk Assumption Date
Issues for determination
- Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation if the premium cheque is post-dated and the accident occurs before the cheque date but after the cover note is issued?
Ratio decidendi
- Where an insurance agent issues a cover note explicitly stating risk coverage from a specific date, and the insurance company accepts a post-dated cheque for premium, the company is bound by the cover note's terms, and a subsequent policy issued with a later commencement date is a unilateral act not binding on the insured.
- Section 64-VB of the Insurance Act, 1938, does not mandate actual receipt of premium by the insurance company for risk coverage, as it allows risk assumption from a date prior to actual receipt, such as the date a cheque is posted or money order booked.
Important points
- Held, the insurance company was rightly held liable to pay compensation based on the cover note issued prior to the accident, despite the post-dated premium cheque.
Keywords
Insurance PolicyCover NotePremium PaymentPost-dated ChequeRisk CoverageSection 64-VB Insurance Act
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000020The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Manju W/o Dinesh Kumar Meena - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000019Shahida and Others - Appellants Versus Mubrak Shah and Others - Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000015Rekha Kanwar W/o Late Shri Satveer Singh - Appellant Versus United India Insurance Company Limited - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000016United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Nine 2 Nine Super Market - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000027Buddharam S/o Shri Moolchand Saini - Appellant Versus Sher Singh Meena S/o Shri Khyaliram Meena ANDO RS – Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000014Jakir Hussain Son of Shri Mohammad Hussain - Appellant Versus Shantilal Sansi Son of Shri Jagrup - Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.