CLX-RAJ-HC-1998-000021
Gumani - Appellant Versus Ram Chandra - Respondent
Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 3 June 1998
AllowedCore ratio / Key holding
Headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — S.166, S.168, Second Schedule — Compensation — Fatal Accident — Multiplier
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — S.166, S.168 — Compensation — Fatal Accident — Loss of Consortium
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — S.166, S.168 — Compensation — Fatal Accident — Loss of Love and Affection — Parents
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — S.166, S.168 — Compensation — Fatal Accident — Loss of Love and Affection — Minor Children
Issues for determination
- Whether the multiplier applied by the Tribunal for calculating compensation was correct and in accordance with law.
- Whether the compensation awarded for loss of consortium to the wife and for loss of love and affection to the minor children and parents was adequate.
Ratio decidendi
- As per the latest amendment in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, the minimum multiplier to be awarded for compensation in fatal accident cases is 18.
- In fatal accident cases under the Motor Vehicles Act, the wife of the deceased is entitled to an amount of Rs. 15,000 towards loss of consortium.
- In fatal accident cases under the Motor Vehicles Act, the mother and father of the deceased are each entitled to a minimum of Rs. 10,000 for loss of love and affection.
- In fatal accident cases under the Motor Vehicles Act, each minor child of the deceased is entitled to a minimum of Rs. 10,000 for loss of love and affection.
Important points
- Appeal for enhancement of compensation in a fatal accident case allowed.
- Total compensation enhanced from Rs. 2,75,000 to Rs. 5,48,840.
- Interest on the enhanced compensation shall be payable as per the holding of the trial court.
Keywords
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000020The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Manju W/o Dinesh Kumar Meena - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000019Shahida and Others - Appellants Versus Mubrak Shah and Others - Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000015Rekha Kanwar W/o Late Shri Satveer Singh - Appellant Versus United India Insurance Company Limited - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000016United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Nine 2 Nine Super Market - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000027Buddharam S/o Shri Moolchand Saini - Appellant Versus Sher Singh Meena S/o Shri Khyaliram Meena ANDO RS – Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000014Jakir Hussain Son of Shri Mohammad Hussain - Appellant Versus Shantilal Sansi Son of Shri Jagrup - Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.