CLX-RAJ-HC-2011-000043

Oriental Insurance Co. Vs. Smt. Motiya & Ors.

Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 13 October 2011

Dismissed

Core ratio / Key holding

After the omission of Section 166(3) from the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the general law of limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963, does not apply to claim petitions filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Headnote

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166(3) — Limitation Act, 1963 — Articles 113, 137 — Claim Petition — Applicability of Limitation

Ratio decidendi

  • After the omission of Section 166(3) from the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the general law of limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963, does not apply to claim petitions filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Important points

  • Held: The applications filed by the Insurance Company contending that the claim petitions were time-barred by limitation were rightly rejected by the Tribunal.
  • Dismissed: The writ petitions filed by the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. challenging the Tribunal's orders were found to be devoid of merit and accordingly dismissed.

Keywords

Motor Vehicles ActLimitationClaim PetitionSection 166(3)

Related orders from this authority

Read the full order on ClaimLex

Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.

Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.