CLX-RAJ-HC-2012-000053
Kailashi (Smt.) & Ors. vs. Gopal Lal & Ors.
Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 14 March 2012
Partly AllowedCore ratio / Key holding
In motor accident claims, where the number of dependent family members is five, the Tribunal ought to reduce 1/4th of the deceased's annual income towards personal expenses for calculating loss of dependency, as guided by the Apex Court in Sarla Verma.
Headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 168 — Compensation — Loss of Dependency — Deduction for Personal Expenses.
Issues for determination
- Whether the Tribunal erred in reducing 1/3rd amount towards maintaining himself instead of 1/4th for calculating loss of dependency, in light of Sarla Verma judgment?
Ratio decidendi
- In motor accident claims, where the number of dependent family members is five, the Tribunal ought to reduce 1/4th of the deceased's annual income towards personal expenses for calculating loss of dependency, as guided by the Apex Court in Sarla Verma.
Important points
- Held: The appeal is partly allowed, enhancing the compensation amount from ₹2,12,000/- to ₹2,32,000/-.
- Held: Claimants are entitled to interest at 6% per annum on the enhanced compensation from the date of filing the claim petition.
- Rejected: The cross-objections filed by the insurer seeking reduction of compensation and interest rate are dismissed.
Keywords
Motor Accident ClaimsCompensationDependencyMultiplierSarla Verma
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000020The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Manju W/o Dinesh Kumar Meena - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000019Shahida and Others - Appellants Versus Mubrak Shah and Others - Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000015Rekha Kanwar W/o Late Shri Satveer Singh - Appellant Versus United India Insurance Company Limited - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000016United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Nine 2 Nine Super Market - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000027Buddharam S/o Shri Moolchand Saini - Appellant Versus Sher Singh Meena S/o Shri Khyaliram Meena ANDO RS – Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000014Jakir Hussain Son of Shri Mohammad Hussain - Appellant Versus Shantilal Sansi Son of Shri Jagrup - Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.