CLX-RAJ-HC-2012-000208
Nemi Chand Vs. Mahendra Kumar & Anr.
Rajasthan High Court · Rajasthan · 24 February 2012
DismissedCore ratio / Key holding
For a claimant to be awarded compensation for permanent disability and future loss of income, it is essential to prove by cogent evidence that such disability adversely affected their earning capacity, which includes examining the concerned doctor who issued the disability certificate or treated the injuries.
Headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — S.168, S.173 — Compensation — Permanent Disability — Proof of Loss of Earning Capacity
Issues for determination
- Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for injuries sustained by the appellant was meager and deserved enhancement?
Ratio decidendi
- For a claimant to be awarded compensation for permanent disability and future loss of income, it is essential to prove by cogent evidence that such disability adversely affected their earning capacity, which includes examining the concerned doctor who issued the disability certificate or treated the injuries.
Important points
- Held: The compensation of Rs. 31,000/- awarded by the Tribunal was just and proper, as the claimant failed to prove permanent disability by cogent evidence, including medical testimony.
Keywords
Motor Vehicles ActCompensationPermanent DisabilityLoss of Earning CapacityProof of Disability
Related orders from this authority
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000020The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Manju W/o Dinesh Kumar Meena - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000019Shahida and Others - Appellants Versus Mubrak Shah and Others - Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000015Rekha Kanwar W/o Late Shri Satveer Singh - Appellant Versus United India Insurance Company Limited - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000016United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant Versus Nine 2 Nine Super Market - Respondent
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000027Buddharam S/o Shri Moolchand Saini - Appellant Versus Sher Singh Meena S/o Shri Khyaliram Meena ANDO RS – Respondents
- CLX-RAJ-HC-2025-000014Jakir Hussain Son of Shri Mohammad Hussain - Appellant Versus Shantilal Sansi Son of Shri Jagrup - Respondents
Read the full order on ClaimLex
Get the complete order text, a licence-stamped PDF, the citator (which orders cite this one), AI-powered answers, and save it to your matters.
Editorial summary prepared by ClaimLex — for reference only, not the official record. Please refer to the original order issued by the authority for the authoritative text.